BMH Med. J. 2020; 7(Suppl): Early Online.   Geriatrics & Gerontology Initiative: International Workshop on Care of the Elderly

Research on Geriatric Population

Nandini K Kumar

Former Deputy Director General Senior Grade (ICMR)

Address for Correspondence: Dr. Nandini K. Kumar, Former Deputy Director General Senior Grade (ICMR), India. E-mail: nandkku@yahoo.com

Elderly population is on the rise globally and so is the situation in India too which is projected to 173 million in 2026 according to a report by United Nations Population Fund and Helpage India. According to population Census of 2011 elderly above the age of 60, famales outnumber males. In Kerala elderly form 12.6% of the ppulation, highest for India. More emphasis needs to be laid on ethical aspect of care of this group which is vulnerable in many ways, more so where women are concerned.

Bioethics includes adherence to ethical principles in practice and research. In dealing with the elderly we can classify them into mainly four groups – mentally and physically active, mentally agile but physically weak, cognitively impaired, terminally ill. As their condition deteriorates, vulnerability and disabilities increase relatively or absolutely when they become incapable of protecting their own interests due to dependence, lack of understanding and communicating ability, power and family support.  Plans for treatment or research involving the geriatric age group has to take these facts into consideration and build safeguards to protect its welfare and rights. This section will concentrate on research aspects when using the elderly as research participants. The points to be considered are given below:
1. The elderly have equal rights to be included in study if it applies to them and addresses their needs.
2. If mentally agile the participants should be able to decide whether to get enrolled in a study or not.
3. For those who are dependent or cognitively impaired the legally authrised/acceptable representative (LAR) should be made to understand the implications before getting her/his consent.
4. The potential participant should not be pressurised by LAR to enroll so researcher should take care of such a conflicting situation, especially when it comes to palliative care patients.
5. Care may be taken to ensure privacy and confidentiality.
6. Informed consent process should be well documented and recorded whenever applicable as in audio, audio/visual process and an impartial witness if applicable (see ICMR guidelines 2017).
7. There should be no coercion or undue inducement.
8. Arrangements for support systems should be made to take care of associated medical and social problems.
9. If possible ancillary care in the form of proper walking and sitting supports, resting rooms and counselling centres should be made available.
10. Permission of appropriate authorities in case of institutionalised persons, specific social and religious communities and tribal communities and treating physician may be required depending on the type of research.
11. Withdrawing consent should be allowed without any negative repercussions.
12. Avoidance of therapeutic misconception.
13. Look out more diligently for adverse events.
14. Only when designing proposals on sensitive topics like abuse of the elderly, deception technique may be used but care should be taken to use only aggregate data for debriefing or publishing without stigmatising the participants.  
15. In limited resources scenario as in pandemics, lesser intensive interventions could be tried to balance ethical justice.
16. Functional status and frailty of elderly patients should be scaled carefully for inclusion in studies.
Role of Ethics Committee (EC)
1. It would be desirable to have empowered representatives in the EC either as member or as coopted member only to review proposals involving the elderly.
2. Only full committee of EC should do intial and continuing review.of such proposals.
3. EC should critically examine it for inclusion/exclusion criteria, conflict of interest issues, benefit-risk assessment, risk minimization,.
4. Minimize exceptions with regard to consent and review which if required should be clearly justified in the proposal.
5. Do more frequent monitoring if required.
6. A separate SOP is required for doing research on the vulnerable group.
7. Whenever possibe consider post-trial access to medication if it shows beneficial effects
8. EC should carefully review the proposal where deception technique is to be used.
Role of Sponsors
1. The sponsor, whether Government, Private, Pharmaceutical company, researcher initiated should justify inclusion of elderly in a research project and make provisions to ensure/protect their safety.
2. Ensure frequent monitoring.
3.  If the topic is sensitive, besides the participants should also provide for protection of the reseachers/research team.
Suggested Readings
1. National Guidelines for Biomedical and Health Research involving Human Participants, 2017.
2. Ethical considerations in conducting clinical trials for elderly cancer patients. 2008 available at DOI: 10.2217/1745509X.4.3.253
3. COVID-19: BGS statement on research for older people during the COVID-19 pandemic. 2020 available at  https://www.bgs.org.uk/resources/covid-19-bgs-statement-on-research-for-older-people-during-the-covid-19-pandemic